If you want to raise some livestock, it’s necessary that you first put up a good fence or enclosure, next you’ll want to control which animals breed with each other… and certainly, of perhaps greatest importance, is making sure they get the food you want them to eat.
If you were an ethical farmer, you’d probably give the animals free range and let them feed at pasture… if your concerns were more selfish, you’d more likely keep them locked in close quarters and feed them cheap, non-nutritious fodder, and shoot them up with antibiotics and hormones to force their production levels up.
As you gaze around your world, it might come home to you that you are, in fact, the livestock kept for the use of the elite power holders of the world.
Your masters aren’t ethical farmers either… they are greedy, and prone to “livestock abuse”. They have fenced you into the small, unnatural enclosures of urban dwelling, piped in toxic water for you to drink, and put in place a grid to surveil your every action.
Far be it from those who think of everything where their cattle are concerned, to neglect to be assured that you are provided with the fodder that they want you to have.
A cheap, non-nutritious diet which they will be happy to add to their regimen of antibiotics and vaccinations which you, their farm animals, are prescribed.
The idea of livestock having access to anything they’d want to eat is ridiculous of course… sheep are dumb, they might decide to dine on something poisonous.
The question is, do you consider yourself a sheep or a human being?
If you are a human being, I might assume that you have enough intelligence to make choices between consuming what is dangerous and what is healthful, and even if I were wrong in my assumptions, I would still have to afford you the right to make a choice, because it’s simply wrong to impose what I feel is best for you on your person by force.
If the government powers that mandate laws on food safety felt that you were a human being with the natural right to make those choices… this would be a vastly different country, maybe even one approaching something like “free”, but alas, they count you as livestock.
To bring into focus the disturbing reality of “their” view of you… consider raw milk.
Most people have been raised up on a repetition of argument for the pasteurization process. Children are informed in school, and tend to believe for the duration of their lives, that this process is what ensures milk is clean enough to drink, so one doesn’t catch some “nasty bug” from drinking the raw product.
In the growing awareness of healthful, natural living, however… some have come to realize that when they have access to consuming raw milk, their health is greatly improved. Ailments which have plagued them their whole lives disappear, they stop needing to visit a doctor, and they generally get sick less often.
For this reason, there is a growing would-be market for raw milk. I say “would-be”, because the sale and distribution of raw milk is illegal in many states, and if the government had its way, it would be illegal in all 50.
From it’s growing popularity has come serious irritation from the “Masters of the Herd”… they can’t have their livestock learning that there are better ways to eat and live than what they have provided, and so the raids have begun.
You might expect that some viciously evil criminal bent on causing death and mayhem had been apprehended, if you witnessed one of these raids… complete with swat teams and armed officers… but the “criminals” have been no one of greater threat than small farmers, often Amish farmers.
The charges are flimsy… even if you feel inclined to uphold a law against the sale and distribution of raw milk, it is mostly the case that these small farmers are only serving the raw milk to their own families or giving it away to neighbors and friends… neither of which are illegal.
In one such incident in which an Amish farm was raided, the officials proclaimed “We have credible evidence that you are involved in interstate commerce.” The said “credible evidence” was not explained, and amounts to hearsay as a justification for the raid.
What’s the law though to those who are above it? If the law can’t get the job done… just weasel around it… can’t have the sheep feeding on open pastures.
In another incident it was shareholders in a dairy farm, and the operators of said farm who came under fire. In the case of shareholders, people pay to have shares of dairy cows which they then can take milk from for their own use. No sale of milk is actually taking place… but still, something must be done… livestock are getting something other than their prescribed fodder.
Here is the description of the event by one of the shareholders:
“”I was placing empty bottles in carriers when I noticed a Cincinnati police cruiser moving through the parking lot slowly toward the trailer.
Another cruiser followed. Officers moved toward the cow-share owners and told them not to pick up the milk that had already been set out, and actually moved in to prevent members from picking up the milk.”
Out of several unmarked cars emerged men in plain clothes who “gathered near the tailgate of the trailer,” Miller says.
Only one would identify himself, an agent of the Ohio Dept. of Agriculture (ODA), she says. Other agents were there from the Kentucky Public Health Dept. and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration.
Joanne Miller thinks there were about eight agents there, plus the four Cincinnati police.
As the agents began confiscating the milk both from the truck and from a few shareholders, and loading it into an ODA van, she says, they told objecting shareholders, “What’s happening here is not your concern.””
glencoltonfarms.com
People who feel that human beings are human beings – and therefore have the intellectual capacity to choose their own foods – are fighting back.
The Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund has filed a lawsuit stating that the ban on raw milk is fundamentally unconstitutional… which it surely is, if we are to accept that in the definition of the pursuit of life and liberty and happiness includes choosing what one wishes to eat or not, and that the control of the health of one’s own body is not just a right afforded by constitution, but afforded by the very definition of being a human being, made in the image of the Creator.
The FDA’s response to the lawsuit though, cleared up for anyone still guessing about where they stand in the structure of society according to the ruling controllers… with no attempt at a sugar coating. Here is their response:
“”Plaintiffs’ assertion of a new ‘fundamental right’ to produce, obtain, and consume unpasteurized milk lacks any support in law.” [p. 4]
“It is within HHS’s authority . . . to institute an intrastate ban [on unpasteurized milk] as well.” [p. 6]
“Plaintiffs’ assertion of a new ‘fundamental right’ under substantive due process to produce, obtain, and consume unpasteurized milk lacks any support in law.” [p.17]
“There is no absolute right to consume or feed children any particular food.” [p. 25]
“There is no ‘deeply rooted’ historical tradition of unfettered access to foods of all kinds.” [p. 26]
“Plaintiffs’ assertion of a ‘fundamental right to their own bodily and physical health, which includes what foods they do and do not choose to consume for themselves and their families’ is similarly unavailing because plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to obtain any food they wish.” [p. 26]
FDA’s brief goes on to state that:
“even if such a right did exist, it would not render FDA’s regulations unconstitutional, because prohibiting the interstate sale and distribution of unpasteurized milk promotes bodily and physical health.” [p. 27]
“There is no fundamental right to freedom of contract.” [p. 27]”
In case the full weight of their message didn’t fully digest in your mind… meditate on this for a moment: “Plaintiffs’ assertion of a ‘fundamental right to their own bodily and physical health, which includes what foods they do and do not choose to consume for themselves and their families’ is similarly unavailing because plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to obtain any food they wish.”
In other words… the government gavel has dropped on the matter, and it has been ruled that you are far too ignorant and degenerate a creature to have control over your own health, the foods you wish to eat and those you don’t… it’s not your body… it’s theirs.
Don’t for one minute believe that anything else is meant to be sent here other than “You Belong To Us”.
The only question left to be asked, is why the controllers of your person would wish to keep things like raw milk out of your hands.
Taking a look at some other things they want to keep out of your hands might explain a lot.
Codex Alimentarius… the devil of food and safety laws, which sadly went without nearly enough attention from people, as it loomed closer to reality in the last couple years, was recently implemented by Obama, when no one was looking.
To explain Codex Alimentarius briefly… this abomination defines anything which could remotely have an effect on your health a “drug”… and so includes everyday vitamins, minerals and natural herbs that might grow in anyone’s back yard.
Since these things are now drugs… you’re not allowed to have them without a prescription… even as a food source.
To ensure that you will not be getting those dangerous vitamins in your foods they will mandate irradiation of all foods you can purchase, and a widespread use of GMO products so that vitamins and minerals can be kept at such low levels in your food as to be negligible.
The problem is that vitamins are not just good for you… they are absolutely necessary for survival.
Just try living without consuming any vitamin C for a while and find out what occurs. First you will have hangnails and cracked lips, then you will have spots developing on your skin, and bleeding from your mucus membranes, eventually you will have large open sores and begin loosing your teeth, and at last, you’ll die… but I wouldn’t really recommend taking the experiment that far.
The cure? Eat an orange.
It just so happens that raw milk has such a powerful potential for healing in the human body that to allow it’s sale and distribution widely would revolutionize the health of the populace.
People would suffer from far fewer ailments which are simply taken for granted as being “normal” and good reasons to go see a doctor. The pharmaceutical industry would take a large financial hit… but the most sinister of reasons is that the elite would lose valuable ground in their attempt to cull their herd.
Depopulation is the holy grail of agendas on the elite’s to-do list.
These are some of the benefits which are denied people who have only pasteurized milk to drink:
Raw milk is anti-microbial… you will get sick much less often with a diet including raw milk.
It is anti-carcinogenic… it actually Fights Cancer..
It is easily digested… people who are lactose intolerant are so because the milk they drink is pasteurized and no longer has the appropriate enzymes to aid digestion of the milk.
It prevents tooth decay… who needs fluoride?
Raw milk raises your metabolic functions, fights obesity and helps build muscle.
It drastically improves asthma conditions, and fights insulin resistance in diabetics
If this world, this society and its governing made sense… if it is organized for the good of people and not for their harm… we would see this product promoted, not banned.
We would see farms run the old fashioned way… ethically… with clean and natural conditions which produce healthy animals, and thus healthy milk.
Instead we have a society which promotes giant agribusiness… encourages the use of chemicals, antibiotics and steroids… cramped living conditions and poor nutrition, which then produce sickly animals and thus filthy milk which is sanitized to be drank, dead microbes and all.
But what can you expect for real cows when human beings are farmed in a like manner?
+ Author : Cyprium
+ Main Page : Home
+ Enter Forum : Culling The Herd
+ Enter Network : Time No Longer
Time No Longer 